Sunday, April 28, 2013

final drafts

Annotated Bibliography

"> Exploratory Essay

"> Step 3

">

Final Reflection


Kiara Shuford

Meagan Keaton

English 1102

29 April 2013 

Final Reflection

The journey that I’ve achieved this semester in this English was the journey of fine tuning my inquiry topic. From the little idea I had to this topic becoming what most of my assignments were based on. Knowing that I had to choose a topic that would be the basis for a lot of my assignments I wanted to pick something that I was interested in and was somewhat interesting to my classmates. The topic I choose was how education can aid in low income students’ social mobility.

Most of my questions came from the reading that we did for homework in the beginning of the semester. The starting point to this whole process was when we read “SocialClass and the Hidden Curriculum of Work”. The author of this passage visited schools in different areas that were on different rungs of the social ladder. She concluded that the children in these schools were receiving a different education, whether it is worse for low class and great for higher class students. This reading brought me to a lot of questions, things like does the curriculum for different classes ever change? Or can students change it themselves? This passage really interested me because it opened a door to many questions that I had about this topic. I could also relate to the passage as well, so I knew if this topic interested I could put some of my personal experiences in these assignments. Some more readings also stood out to me and related to “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work, these were “On the Uses of Liberal Education”, and “Women without Class”.

As we read more passages in class I began to notice more connections to several of the readings. These connections to the passages had to be discovered and put that in my exploratory essay. In writing this essay it helped me explore and discover what interested me about these readings and what I wanted to my inquiry question to be. Many of the readings focused on students that went to school in low income areas and were very underprivileged. So, this meant magnifying minorities of race and gender. So as my inquiry question was evolving in my head I knew that I wanted to focus on the underprivileged students. As soon as I knew what my inquiry question was or what I wanted to focus on for my inquiry, I was assigned a research proposal. I then conferenced this letter to get the opinion of my conference group, as we conferenced my paper I realized what inquiry question I wanted to ask. The question I came up with is, “How can education help low socioeconomic students with social mobility?”

Now that I had my inquiry question I had to find reliable legitamint sources to answer my question and help prove my suspicions. I had to find print sources and web sources to place in a annotated bibliography before writing any papers on this topic. I believe that the sources I found were really interesting and provided me with a lot of facts that I could use in my papers and assignments to come. To analyze my sources better I performed some active reading excersises, dialogic journal 1 and 2. Doing this really made me read my sources and understand them on a more critical thinking type of way. These exercises also made it easier to begin to write my annotated bibliography. Before this annotated bibliography I hadn’t written one before, the preparations that I made for this assignment made it less intimidating. Also, writing the annotated bibliography before doing any inquiry assignments because it made me understand the sources, so that when I went to write these assignments I could focus on my writing instead of going back and forth between writing and the sources. 

After the annotated bibliography was finished I could begin to write my inquiry question papers. For the first step of the inquiry project we had to write a dialect between our sources in the layout of a play script. This made me see the common thread between my sources, the connections they share between one another. This assignment was challenging for me because I wasn’t used to writing dialect as much as formal writing. So, in this paper I didn’t have a lot of humor or dialect as there should have been. This is why step 2 was much easier for me. For this assignment we had to take our dialect from step 1 and put it into a formal writing style, but with the same connections. I enjoyed writing this paper because I could put the facts that I found from my sources in it and also my personal experiences, I could also put in my personal experiences which I think really tells my audience why I’m interested in this topic. From this point we the class was divided up into group based on our inquiry topics. We had to put together a multimodal project that combined all of our topics to present to our class. All the ladies topics in my group magnified the low income students and how their resources were so much lower than students of higher classes. We are doing a video to show our class the difference between these different schools. Coming together with our topics especially since there are related and connected has made this project more interesting because I’m not only working with the topic that interested me, but I can see other peoples topics and see what interested them.

The journey that I’ve taken in English 1102 has been filled with a lot of work, but I believe has made me a better writer. In this class I was introduced to a lot of different writing assignments, writing styles, and writing online. I discovered all this all the while working on something that I picked and was interested in. My inquiry topic interested me and by finding out the facts about this topic, I now know how to fix the problem that my inquiry question brings up.

journal entry 2-18-13


journal entry 2-6-13


Sunday, April 14, 2013

Joining the Conversation: Step 3


Kiara Shuford

Megan Keaton

English 1102

10 April 2013

           

Joining the Conversation: Step 2

            When we read the article “Social Class and the hidden Curriculum of Work”, in class it focused on the negative impact that low social class has on a student’s education. It described how growing up in a low class meant you would stay there because of the education you received this also included students of a higher class.  So for this paper I wanted to focus on how a student’s social class contributes to their education and how they can use education for social mobility. My research took me in a lot of different directions, but this is what I thought answered my question, how can education help low SES students with social mobility?, the best.

To begin you have to define social mobility and how it’s actually related to education. Zefang the author of the article, “Social Mobility and Educational Selection” defines social mobility as, “a phenomenon in which enables, in the structure of social stratification an individual or group’s social status to move up or down their occupations to be transformed.” (Zefang 610) Social mobility can be divided up into categories horizontal, vertical, intergenerational, and intra-generational, but for this question I only focused on intergenerational, which means in the same generation. So now how is social mobility related to education? The article “Social Mobility and Educational Selection” says that social class impacts the choices people make including education selection and what career people choose as well. The authors of the article define educational selection as “Education selection refers school system examinations, assessment, evaluation and classification.” But students that have a low socioeconomic status don’t have the resources than those students that belong to a higher class, so they tend to fall behind because of their lack of resources. “Education is a bridge to social mobility and can give underprivileged people the way to a more privileged life” (Zefang 611) and could be the only option for some students.

Three specific factors can contribute to the social mobility and education selections these students make according to the article. The first factor is your family's income; students are born into their social class and the income of their family’s impact them tremendously. So if other generations in your family have low incomes they most likely received a low education and this will ultimately be your fate as well. Another factor that contributes is your parents IQ; there is a direct relationship between your parents IQ and yours. The higher an IQ a student has the further they will go with their education. The last factor that contributes to social mobility and education you choose is what the author, Paul Attewell, calls high-mastery. The book describes high-mastery as “a sense that controls one’s own fate” (Attewell). These three things combine to predict how a student’s educational career will possibly turn out compared to their relationship. According to this research being in a low class will not keep you from going to college or higher education opportunities.

Not everyone thinks that being raised in a lower class actually hinders students educationally, the authors of the book Mobility and Inequality, they believe that underprivileged students have more drive to finish high school and to pursue higher education. And because they can choose what education they receive and where, as we learned from “Social Mobility and Educational Selection”, these students are choosing careers and schools they’re interested in not the ones chosen for them. Saying thatWealth differences across families are interpreted more broadly, either as indicators of differential behavioral orientations correlated with savings behavior and lifetime success or reasons families to pursue alternative strategies for human capital investment in their offspring”.(Stanford University Press) And in the article, “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” they actually say that students from lower social classes are also targeted for things like graduate school and higher degree programs. And because they can choose what education they receive and where, as we learned from “Social Mobility and Educational Selection”, these students are choosing careers and schools they’re interested in not the ones chosen for them. They also believe that these students will be more inclined to work with students with low socioeconomic statuses’ in their career choices.

So, what can happen to give lower class students better resources and a better understanding of their curriculum? In the book A Notion at Risk, the authors give a few suggestions on how we as a country could make the education provided in our public schools better for these students. The first thing they think would help is summer school or an extended year for these students. As you can imagine all students loose most of what they learn during the school year when they have summer break, so if summer school or an extended year was enforced this wouldn’t happen as much and these students can advance. They say “summer programs should provide poor children with the types of enriching experiences that middle-class children receive during the summer, as opposed to the traditional approach of reviewing curriculum taught during the year.”(Century Foundation), so not teaching the same subjects twice, but going more in depth with these subjects. The other thing they believe will give lower class students more of a chance for social mobility is increased funding in their schools. The authors of this book say that funding should go to the people that are in dire need of it, individual classrooms could receive it. This funding could buy the resources and materials needed by school systems and teachers to raise the standard of learning in these underprivileged neighborhoods. These funds wouldn’t be to just increase the resources students have at school, but to also help their families at home, so they have a better environment there as well. Money for things like food and housing would be given because they are conducive to a good learning environment and because the student would only have to worry about their studies.

To conclude this paper I thought it would be appropriate to tell some success stories of just how far education can take someone. There is hope for everyone in the world that thinks their life can’t get any better. The story of Oprah Winfrey is a good place to start. When she was a young girl she lived in a very poor area of Mississippi with her grandmother while her mother looked for work in the North. When her mother did find a job she went from living in a poor area of Mississippi, to living in a poor area of Milwaukee. From the ages of 9-13 she was molested and sexually abused by male relatives when her mother was working. Oprah was emotionally distraught by all this pain that she had suffered from the early years of her life, so she ran away from that situation and went to live with her father. She then began to focus more on her studies, not because she wanted to, but her father was very strict and wanted the best for her. Vernon Winfrey wanted the best for his daughter, so he made her read a book and write a book report every week. Oprah began excel in school, she was an honor student and won oratory awards. Doing well in school ultimately led to Oprah receiving a full scholarship to Tennessee State University and a job at a local new station being a correspondent. Since going to college Oprah has done so much, things like having her own show showing in 140 different countries, being in movies, and owning a couple of different businesses. She reached her goals by getting the education she needed and turning her bad situation into a place she didn’t want to go back to. She is now one of the richest people in the United States, and she is a black woman which makes what she has done and even greater feat.

Another very inspiring story about a black woman that used education to get ahead in life is someone you probably never heard of. Ursula Burns, now the CEO and Chairman of Xerox, was raised in the projects of the lower east side of Manhattan. “Many people told me I had three strikes against me. I was black. I was a girl. And I was poor.”(Burns) Her mother reassured her that that was not the case and encouraged her that the only way to get out of this situation was to get and education. She would tell Ursula, “Where she was didn’t define who she was” (Burns). Even though her mother didn’t make that much money she still thought it was necessary to send Ursula to good catholic schools. She finally found her love of Mechanical engineering when she was offered a spot in the freshman class of Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute. After this opportunity popped up more started to emerge, things like: taking an internship with Xerox in upstate New York, going to an Ivy League school for a graduate degree, and signing on with Xerox. Making her way to the top wasn’t an easy job, but Ursula Burns did it with “a good education, a strong work ethic and the courage to lean in.”(Burns)

These stories are very inspiring for anyone in the same situation these women were or even someone trying to get a perception of what their life was like. And after doing all this research and what I‘ve witnessed I’ve acquired an opinion on education and social mobility. For me I would say that I didn’t grow up as bad as the students that I’m writing about or even Oprah and Ursula’s life, but I know some people that did and have made, something out of their life with education. Having more resources than others can help, but it shouldn’t hold anyone back. People that work hard to overcome their shortcomings I believe deserve what they strive for and as a country if we can help give students more of a chance to overcome these short comings we should.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited

A Century Foundation Book. A Notion at Risk. New York: Richard D. Kahlenberg, 2000, Print.

Anyon, Jean. “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” Journal of Education. Vol. 162, no. 1(1980): 1-11. Print.

Attewell, Paul and David E. Lavin. Passing the Torch. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007. Print.

Dong Zefang, Wang Yanbin, Chen Wenijiao. “Social Mobility and Educational Selection.” Educational Research and Experiment vol. 1 (2009): 13-18. Electronic.

“Oprah Winfrey.” Academy of Achievement. American Academy of Achievement, 1996-2013. Web. 28 Nov 2011.

Stanford University Press. Mobility and Inequality. Stanford, California: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, 2006. Print.

Teresa McDowell, Andrae’ L. Brown, Nicole Cullen, and April Duyn. “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy Vol. 39 (2013): 72-__. Electronic.

 “Ursula M. Burns.” Lean In. Leanin.Org. 2013 Web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Self-Assesment Reflection: Joining the Conversation Step 3

1. My goals for this paper were to get my inquiry question across to the audience and show them my extensive research.
2. Step 1 and 2 really helped me develop this paper, so writing them first helped me see what I really wanted to write.
3. My writing changed by becoming more focused on the topic and my peers gave me good ideas with things to add.
4. The people that stories I put in my paper really helped because their stories inspired me to write this paper to help inspire others.
5. I've learned about myself as a writer that if I do the research about a topic anything can become interesting to me.
6. The hardest part of writing this paper was adding more after writing the first draft. The easiest part was putting together the ideas of my sources.
7. The part of the paper I'm proudest of is the body of the paper. The connections made are what I'm proud of.
8. The parts I need work on is the introduction. I've added more facts about my topic to it I just don't know if it goes with the assignment that you gave us.
9. My brainstorming was to first write the play with dialogue. Then strip the dialogue part to make academic paper and then add more and stories to my final draft.
  

Workshop Reflection: Joining the Conversation Step 2

1. Isai- Needed to add more facts that I had in my play
Brian- Get rid of the word "so" in my paper and maybe add some stories about people that have lived through this
Leaslie-Likes the facts that I have already in my paper, but I need to add more to my introduction.
2. The most helpful piece of advice was to add stories, I was worried about not being able to add two more pages to my paper with what I had so this was very helpful.
3. The least helpful advice was adding more to my introduction, just because I already knew that it needed help.
4. My plans for revision is to add more to my introduction and to add stories to my paper.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Joining the Conversation: Step 2


Kiara Shuford

Megan Keaton

English 1102

10 April 2013

           

Joining the Conversation: Step 2

            When we read the “”in class it focused on the negative impact that low social class has on a student’s education. So for this paper I wanted to focus on how a student’s social class contributes to their education and how they can use education for social mobility.     

To begin you have to define social mobility and how it’s actually related to education. Zefang the author of the article, “” defines social mobility as,  “a phenomena in which enables, in the structure of social stratification an individual or group’s social status to move up or down their occupations to be transformed.” (Zefang610) Social mobility can be divided up into categories horizontal, vertical, intergenerational, and intra-generational, but for this question I only focused on intergenerational, which means in the same generation. So now how is social mobility related to education? The article “Social Mobility and Educational Selection” says that social class impacts the choices people make including education selection and what career people choose as well. This means that social class impacts choices such as classes and tests the student takes. But students that have a low socioeconomic status don’t have the resources than those students that belong to a higher class, so they tend to fall behind because of their lack of resources. “Education is a bridge to social mobility and can give underprivileged people the way to a more privileged life” (Zefang 611) and could be the only option for some students.

Three specific factors can contribute to the social mobility and education selections these students make according to the article. The first factor is your family's income; students are born into their social class and the income of their family’s impact them tremendously. So if other generations in your family have low incomes they most likely received a low education and this will ultimately be your fate as well. Another factor that contributes is your parents IQ; there is a direct relationship between your parents IQ and yours. The higher an IQ a student has the further they will go with their education. The last factor that contributes to social mobility and education you choose is what the author, Paul Attewell, calls high-mastery. The book describes high-mastery as “a sense that controls one’s own fate” (Attewell). These three things combine to predict how a student’s educational career will possibly turn out compared to their relationship. According to this research being in a low class will not keep you from going to college or higher education opportunities.

Not everyone thinks that being raised in a lower class actually hinders students educationally, the authors of the book Mobility and Inequality, they believe that underprivileged students have more drive to finish high school and to pursue higher education. Saying thatWealth differences across families are interpreted more broadly, either as indicators of differential behavioral orientations correlated with savings behavior and lifetime success or reasons families to pursue alternative strategies for human capital investment in their offspring”.(Stanford University Press) And in the article, “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” they actually say that students from lower social classes are also targeted for things like graduate school and higher degree programs. They also believe that these students will be more inclined to work with students with low socioeconomic statuses’ in their career choices.

So, what can happen to give lower class students better resources and a better understanding of their curriculum? In the book A Notion at Risk, the authors give a few suggestions on how we as a country could do just that. The first thing they think would help is summer school or an extended year for these students. As you can imagine all students loose most of what they learn during the school year when they have summer break, so if summer school or an extended year was enforced this wouldn’t happen as much and these students can advance. They say “summer programs should provide poor children with the types of enriching experiences that middle-class children receive during the summer, as opposed to the traditional approach of reviewing curriculum taught during the year.”(Century Foundation), so not teaching the same subjects twice, but going more in depth with these subjects. The other thing they believe will give lower class students more of a chance for social mobility is increased funding in their schools. These funds wouldn’t be to just increase the resources students have at school, but to also help their families at home, so they have a better environment there as well. Money for things like food and housing would be given because they are conducive to a good learning environment and because the student would only have to worry about their studies.

After doing all this research and what I‘ve witnessed I’ve acquired an opinion on education and social mobility. For me I would say that I didn’t grow up as bad as the students that I’m writing about, but I know some people that did and have made, something out of their life with education. Having more resources than others can help, but it shouldn’t hold anyone back. People that work hard to overcome their shortcomings I believe deserve what they strive for and as a country if we can help give students more of a chance to overcome these short comings we should.

 

Works Cited

A Century Foundation Book. A Notion at Risk. New York: Richard D. Kahlenberg, 2000, Print.

Attewell, Paul and David E. Lavin. Passing the Torch. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007. Print.

Dong Zefang, Wang Yanbin, Chen Wenijiao. “Social Mobility and Educational Selection.” Educational Research and Experiment vol. 1 (2009): 13-18. Electronic.

Stanford University Press. Mobility and Inequality. Stanford, California: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, 2006. Print.

Teresa McDowell, Andrae’ L. Brown, Nicole Cullen, and April Duyn. “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy Vol. 39 (2013): 72-__. Electronic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Questions about comments on Annotated Bibliography

1. The most helpful piece of advice I received was the fact that I put some of the analysis parts and summary parts in the wrong parts of the my bibliography, so maybe I could clean up my paper a bit.
2. The least helpful piece of advice was the fact that I used all the print sources. Two of my sources were online academic articles, so they were electronic.
3. I don't have any questions, the comments were pretty straight forward and I now know how to revise.
4. I plan to clean up my annotated bibliography and place things where they need to be. Also add a little more explanation to my "how I'll use it" part of the bibliography.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

workshop reflection: Joining the Conversation step1

1. Brian: It didn't feel like a conversation felt more like an academic paper. Needs to have a background story or more of a setting.
Leaslie: Feels the same close to the annotated bibliography. List of characters could use for academic paper.
Isai: Thinks you did a perfect job, not a conversation, just random talking. Make it flow more, felt like it should be more creative, think of a setting. Didn't understand third page second dialogue was confusing reword it.
Ashley: To forced doesn't feel like dialogue. Needs to have more of a interaction between characters. Too direct shouldn't tell us exactly whats going on. Can add a little dry humor.
2. I had a concern that my paper wasn't much of a dialogue, and everyone told me that my paper didn't really follow the assignment.
3. Everyone pretty much said the same thing and how I could change it, so I don't think any advice was least helpful.
4. I tend to put more conversation into my paper and give more of a background story and character list.

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Joining the Conversation: Step 1


Kiara Shuford

Megan Keaton

English 1102

2 April 2013

My sources are on an education board, they are discussing research they found on how education helps low SES students with social mobility. All of my sources are meeting at a local high school to go over what they came up with and are trying to gather solutions to fix the problem of getting low socioeconomic status students better education. I’m in the audience listening to their ideas.

ME: To get the audience fully engaged in the discussion the sources begin by giving their definition of social mobility.

ZEFANG: “Social mobility is a phenomenon in which enables, in the structure of social stratification, an individual or group’s social status to move up or down and their occupations to be transformed.” It can be divided up into horizontal and vertical and intra-generational and intergenerational.

ME: For this discussion the sources were only focusing on intra-generational mobility, which is defined as an individual’s change in social class.

CENTURY FOUNDATION: Students of low economic status don’t have the same resources as the students of higher social classes and tend to fall behind because of their lack of resources.

MCDOWELL: We believe that social class impacts the choices people make including career choices, education selections, values, and expectations. Education is a bride for social mobility and could be the only option some students have for social mobility.

ZEFANG: Social mobility, can also affect your education selection.

STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS: We performed research that compared a student’s entry to college to their parent’s income. And that many students that are low SES situations haven’t picked college just because they don’t have the means to afford it.

ATTEWELL: We’ve also done research that compared students and the other generations in their family. It describes the maternal grandparents and mothers with low education and low income raise children that are less likely to go to college. Another factor that could contribute to if a student goes to college is a mother’s IQ.

ME: This was surprising to me because I feel like as students we need to have choices in our education selection, be able to choose what we want and not have to deal with what we are given just because of the social class we were born into.

ATTEWELL: These factors combine in favor or against these students, but some can outweigh or even balance another factor. This just means that even if you’re born into one of these unfortunate situations doesn’t mean you’ll never go to college because you can have another factors working in your favor. It’s not “one strike and you’re out.”

STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS: But on the other hand we also believe that underprivileged students have more of a drive to finish college because of how they grew up.

ZEFANG: Education selection refers school system examinations, assessment, evaluation and classification. Because of the choices the different students make they become concerned about the types of school and professions available to them on graduating. American students in particular are focused on horizontal mobility because people now go to school based on what their interests.

MCDOWELL: Because education is a bridge to social mobility so many students that are from low social classes are more inclined to choose higher education, but they are also targeted for things like graduate school and higher degree programs.

ME: Now that the audience have gotten some background information on the issue and fully understand that issue the sources can now discuss what they intend to do to better the education of low SES students and how they can reach their goals of vertical social mobility. The first source begins with what they think the best solution is. That is to make the public education better for K-12 students.

CENTURY FOUNDATION: The best thing to make social mobility for underprivileged students accessible is to better the education in our public schools, grades K-12. We’ve seen in our research that the longer the school year and shorter the summer the more the students retain. So summer school to go more in depth with the material would be a part of the solutions we’ve come up with. The second part to our solution is increased funding for these public schools. Not only more money in the school system, but as far as individual classrooms.

ME: I can really relate to these students because I feel like I’ve never really had many resources in my school system, but I’ve made the most of my situation just like many other student in the same situation. So I liked to hear these ideas because it seemed like this source really wanted to help the underprivileged students of these areas.   

ALL SOURCES: The more the public is educated on the issues that are happening around them the faster the issue can get cleared up. Thanks for staying and listening to our presentation.

The sources leave believing that they educated their audience on the issue that they have focused their research on and hoping that the issue will get cleared up, not only for the greater good of the country, but the greater good of those less fortunate in our country.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, April 1, 2013

Self Assesment

1. My goals for this bibliography was to understand and read all my sources to ultimately help myself write a good paper. I think I reached my goals because I now understand all of my sources.
2. I used my time by reading and understanding every source and then writing the annotation after
3. The workshop of the first three sources really helped by pointing out what I lacked in my bibliography, so with the next two sources I added more.
4. The active reading activities really helped me write the bibliography as well because it helped me understand the sources a lot more then if I would of just read it myself.
5. This was the first annotated bibliography the I've ever written, so I've learned that they aren't so scary and that I actually can write one.
6. The hardest part of the paper for me was writing a detailed "how you use it" part of the annotation.
7. The easiest part of the paper was finding usable quotes that I can actually use in my future papers.
8. The part of my paper that might need a little bit of work would be the "how you use it" part of the annotation. It might need to be added to, but I tried to add as much detail as I could.
9. My writing process was to first read my sources and get a good understanding of all of them, then to write the paragraphs of the annotation with as much detail as possible. Then write down the quotes that stood out to me as I read the source.

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Annotated Bibliography 2nd Draft


Teresa McDowell, Andrae’ L. Brown, Nicole Cullen, and April Duyn. “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy Vol. 39 (2013): 72-__. Print.

 

In this article, the authors conduct research on low SES students and they’re higher education habits when they go into their career choice of Family Therapy. They first define how they view social class and what factors that they have found effect their definition of social class. Some of the factors they refer to are education level, income, and occupation prestige and then go on to further explain how these factors and how they are specifically affected. For my paper I only needed the education level part of the article which was very interesting in its own right. The authors of this article believe that pursuing higher education degrees and attending graduate school are directly related to social class.

In this article they lay some things out that I had suspicions were true.  They have done extensive research and surveyed many students, to get their results. The authors of this article believe that social class makes you who you are, and it has an influence on the education decisions you make. In the long run these authors believe that these students choose to pursue higher degrees and graduate school. They also believe that these people are more likely to work with people of low SES status after their own career is established.

In my paper I will use this article for the facts and it’s also very quotable. These things I can use to back up my own opinions about my inquiry question within my paper. It also begins to answer my inquiry question; with my other sources my question will eventually be answered.

·         It is also striking given the emphasis on recruiting and retaining diverse students(including students from lower- and working-class families) in graduate programs.(pg.72)

 

·         Career and occupational development including the possibility of attending graduate school and the range of choices relative to pursuing higher degrees, is directly influenced by social class.(pg.73)

 

·         We expected our research to contribute a corrective agenda; that bringing the collective thoughts, ideas, and experiences of students from lower- and working-class families to the forefront is a way to promote more inclusive and just family therapy programs.(pg.74)

 

Dong Zefang, Wang Yanbin, Chen Wenijiao. “Social Mobility and Educational Selection.” Educational Research and Experiment vol. 1 (2009): 13-18. Print.

            This article goes more in depth with the relationship of social mobility and education selection. To begin they also define their definition of social mobility and the different types of social mobility, whether it would be vertical or horizontal. I can also be divided into inter-and intra- generational mobility. The authors then go on to say that these types of social mobility can happen to different people based on their social class. To tie in the education aspect the authors of this article say that social mobility is joined with social choice and education selection is a part of social choice. They define education selection as the quality of assessments, examinations, and assignation of students to different levels and types of educational unit.  This is the two things that are closely related and interact according to these authors.

            The authors of this article believe that education is a bridge to social mobility and can give underprivileged people they way to a more privileged life. They also believe that in a more traditional since of social mobility is closed and educational selection can only be carried out within the ruling class, but now that we live in a modern  society it’s more open and educational selection can be more geared to the needs of different people.

            Like in the article “Social Class in Family Therapy Education: Experiences of Low SES Students” this article makes very good points. It also has good definitions that I feel are necessary to make my points again with my own opinions in my inquiry paper.

·         On one side, the character, direction, speed, level, methods and trends of social mobility affect the aims, goals, functions, scope, strategy, content and methods of choice in education.(pg.610)

 

·         The function of social mobility in education is achieved by training and selecting members of society, enabling them to transform into members of different occupations, thus generating a degree of social stratification.(pg.611)

 

·         Especially in modern society, education has become the basis of social mobility and irrational social mobility and a bridge leading to the ideal career.(pg.612)

 

A Century Foundation Book. A Notion at Risk. New York: Richard D. Kahlenberg, 2000, Print.

In this book I used 2 different sections that I think would be helpful in my inquiry paper, “Making K-12 Public Education an Engine for Social Mobility” and “Equalizing Education Resources on Behalf of Disadvantaged Children.” In the first section the author describes what he believes will make public education an engine for social mobility. He focuses on poor students and how to raise their education level to middle class or even private school levels. Summer school and increased funding for education within these underprivileged areas are what the author believes will give these students an even playing ground later on in life.

That’s exactly what the author of this book wants to change, the fact that underprivileged students are getting the same or even a similar education as even middle-class students. The book proposes that summer school or an extended school year would be good for these students to further explain the curriculum. It also proposes increased funding and not just in school systems, but it goes all the way to individual classrooms. I liked these ideas because it seems like the author of this book really wants to help these underprivileged students to better them and only them.

Using this book will be simple because it has great ideas to change the problem that has arisen in the United States. To actually put in my paper, this paper gives me solutions for my inquiry question.

·         Summer programs should provide poor children with the types of enriching experiences that middle-class children receive during the summer, as opposed to the traditional approach of reviewing curriculum taught during the year.

 

·         Rothstein also provides guidance on addressing other forms of school spending inequality, and he urges that more resources be provided to improve the social capital of disadvantage families outside of schools through programs that improve nutrition and housing.

 

·         Americans are at once deeply committed to the institution of public education and fairly pessimistic about the current state of public schools—suggesting the time is ripe for public school reform.

 

Stanford University Press. Mobility and Inequality. Stanford, California: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, 2006. Print.

This book puts forth a lot of research to break the cycle of inequality and mobility not happening to those less fortunate. They gather their research and research of others to construct the section that I used for my paper, “Educational Attainment and the College Enrollment Decision”. In their research they first compare student’s entry to college with that student’s parent’s income. Then they look at how the amount of students that want to go to college has grown so much because of the fact that degrees can provide them with more of an opportunity to grow and of course more income themselves. Even though these numbers have grown the authors believe that it’s still low for such an advanced nation, like the United States, so they believe that we can do more to improve the numbers.

            Throughout their research the authors of this book have exposed a lot about social mobility and educational attainment. Their research tells us that, many low SES students and families haven’t picked college just because they don’t have the means to afford that option. They also believe that despite the income of a family, you can’t predict if someone’s family is very frugal and saves for their college tuition before they’re even born. They even say that underprivileged people can sometimes have more of a drive to go to college because of how they grew up. So, their research is accurate, but there are some exceptions.

This book lays everything out on the table, research wise and lets the reader know just how social mobility and educational attainment is laid out within the United States. We are growing as a nation and some of the things that couldn’t be attained by the some of the less fortunate. But we can do so much more than what we are already doing. I will use this extensive research in my paper to elaborate on ideas that others have from my other sources and also ideas that I have myself.

·         The customary practice of measuring family advantage with socioeconomic status was challenged by those who wished to focus more directly on the availability of resources.

 

·         Wealth differences across families are interpreted more broadly, either as indicators of differential behavioral orientations correlated with savings behavior and lifetime success or reasons families to pursue alternative strategies for human capital investment in their offspring.

 

·         In particular, increases in college enrollment should be smaller for prospective students from resources-poor families, as these students’ relative access to liquid funds to finance a college education has declined.

 

 

Attewell, Paul and David E. Lavin. Passing the Torch. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007. Print.

This book brings up some very interesting points. The authors of this book describes the relationship between the maternal grandparents and mothers income and education level compared to what you can expect in that mothers child. It describes how studies have been done to show that grandparents with low education or have a low income, their grandchildren are less likely to go to college and the opposite for high of both situations, same for the mother in the same situations. Another factor to a child entering college is if their mother has a high or low IQ and something they call high-mastery. This is defined as, “a sense that one controls one’s own fate”.

The authors of this book are very meticulous with their research; they have very organized and thought out tables to explain this research. They believe that this is as close as you’re going to get when predicting what your child can achieve in life. Saying that high-mastery women raise high-mastery children is just some of the thought they put into their research.  They also say that these factors combine and something can outweigh or even balance another factor. So for someone with one factor can still achieve a lot in the education department because other factors outweigh that one less than complimentary factor It’s not “one strike and you’re out”.

Because the information in this book is so organized it will be very easy to understand and add to my paper. Because the authors explain that about everyone can go to college based on the information about their mother and grandparents, I will add that information to my paper to enhance the idea that even low SES students can go on to secondary education.

·         To what extent do social privilege and social disadvantage reach across the generations and affect the life prospects of grandchildren?

 

·         We find that the probability of a child’s educational success is substantially related to the resources of the maternal grandparents and mother, measured in most cases before the child was born.

 

 

·         This is partly because this psychological orientation is itself passed on from mother to child, so that high-mastery women bring up high-mastery children.